Re: [boost] [1.36.0] Libraries with unmerged changes?

From: Emil Dotchevski (emil_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-08 20:57:41

The differences in the exception library were very minor but I merged
them in anyway. Also, I updated the documentation.

Emil Dotchevski
Reverge Studios, Inc.
http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode

On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Below is a list of libraries whose header files appear to differ between the
> trunk and branches/release.
>
> The most likely causes are:
>
> * Changes that should be merged into branches/release for 1.36.0. If that is
> the case, developers need to merge those changes right away!
>
> * Work in process that should *not* be merged into branches/release for
> 1.36.0. Please let me know that that is the case so I can stop worrying:-)
>
> * Issues with the newly minted script used to generate the report. Please
> let me know so the script can be improved.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --Beman
>
> archive
> asio
> bimap
> circular_buffer
> compatibility
> config
> date_time
> detail
> dynamic_bitset
> exception
> filesystem
> format
> function
> function_types
> fusion
> gil
> graph
> intrusive
> io
> iostreams
> iterator
> math
> mpi
> mpl
> numeric
> optional
> parameter
> pending
> pool
> program_options
> property_tree
> python
> random
> regex
> serialization
> signals
> spirit
> statechart
> system
> test
> thread
> tr1
> type_traits
> units
> utility
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>