|
Boost : |
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-12 15:23:01
Sebastian Redl wrote:
> Edward Diener wrote:
>> I would like to suggest that Boost have separate NGs for each
>> individual library. I also think, for each individual library, a
>> separate user and developer NG should exist.
>>
>> While this will lead to many more NGs, it will make it much easier for
>> users/developers to have concerns addressed for a particular Boost
>> library, and to have the implementor of that library address those
>> concerns. Also of course it will make it easier for people interested,
>> or working with, a particular Boost library, to go to the appropriate
>> NG to read about any issues brought up regarding that library.
> A developer list per library might make sense. However, a user list per
> library would, in my opinion (and experience from forums), mostly lead
> to misposted messages.
Boost users are better than you assume them to be. If there were
individual user library NGs I believe the vast majority of users would
follow that guideline to post to the appropriate NG.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk