Re: [boost] [smart_ptr> C++0x unique_ptr ?

From: Sid Sacek (ssacek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-12 18:23:50

Isn't the 'unique_ptr<>' a replacement for the standard C++ auto_ptr<> that's going to be deprecated in the next standard?

-Sid Sacek

-----Original Message-----
From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Loïc Joly
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2008 6:10 PM
To: boost_at_[hidden]
Subject: [boost] [smart_ptr> C++0x unique_ptr ?

Hello,

I was wondering whether there was any plan to implement a unique_ptr in 
boost, that would replace scoped_ptr, and would default to scoped_ptr on 
compilers lacking move semantic?

Best regards,

-- 
Loïc
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost