Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-16 07:07:48

Next message: Daryle Walker: "Re: [boost] Conflict between Boost.Integer and boost/detail/numeric_traits.hpp"
Previous message: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] [smart_ptr> C++0x unique_ptr ?"
In reply to: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] [smart_ptr> C++0x unique_ptr ?"
Next in thread: Howard Hinnant: "Re: [boost] [smart_ptr> C++0x unique_ptr ?"
Reply: Howard Hinnant: "Re: [boost] [smart_ptr> C++0x unique_ptr ?"
Reply: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] [smart_ptr> C++0x unique_ptr ?"

Mathias Gaunard skrev:
> Mathias Gaunard wrote:
>> I personally don't see the point in dynamic deleters, they're only
>> specializations of dynamic ones.
>
> I meant static ones, sorry.

For the last of first occurrence?

-Thorsten

Next message: Daryle Walker: "Re: [boost] Conflict between Boost.Integer and boost/detail/numeric_traits.hpp"
Previous message: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] [smart_ptr> C++0x unique_ptr ?"
In reply to: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] [smart_ptr> C++0x unique_ptr ?"
Next in thread: Howard Hinnant: "Re: [boost] [smart_ptr> C++0x unique_ptr ?"
Reply: Howard Hinnant: "Re: [boost] [smart_ptr> C++0x unique_ptr ?"
Reply: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] [smart_ptr> C++0x unique_ptr ?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk