From: Emil Dotchevski (emil_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-16 16:36:42
I second that, and may I also suggest adding allocator to boost::any
like in boost::shared_ptr and boost::function?
Reverge Studios, Inc.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Thorsten Ottosen
> As eplained in
> boost::any is not exactly optimal w.r.t. efficiency. Diggins implementation
> avoid allocation for objects smaller or equal to sizeof(void*). Personally I
> think this is too small a buffer; Boost.Function uses at least two words; I
> think it might be worth to go for 3 words.
> Would anyone be interested in implementing this?
> best regards
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk