Re: [boost] data_binding library for boost... Any interest?

From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-24 22:26:21

AMDG

Brian Davis wrote:
>> --except where the compiler can
>> prove that no event is registered for a particular integer.
>>     
>
> Yes... Exactly.  Either you pay for the overhead of the template type or you
> pay in the compiler adding extra code for types where events can be
> registered. . The difference is that it provides for direct data binding for
> primitive types.  Syntax can make it clear to the compiler that extra code
> must be inserted.  In your example there is no syntax that specifies a
> get/set for the local variable i. The problem I think is clear the
> solution... not so much.
>   

Ok.  That's better.  One more issue:

Callbacks should be unregistered when the object that they are associated
with are destroyed, right?  How do you propose to handle this for POD?

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe