Re: [boost] 1.36 documentation

From: Alp Mestan (alpmestan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-26 19:57:23

I think utility would be fine.
Concurrent Programming is in my opinion too "restrictive".

On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Daniel James <daniel_james_at_[hidden]>wrote:

> On 26/07/2008, Emil Dotchevski <emil_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Thanks Daniel!
> >
> >  Actually, I am not sure what's the best category for this library.
> >  It's a low level lib, so perhaps it should go under utility,
> >  miscellaneous doesn't seem descriptive enough. Any thoughts?
>
> I'm really not sure. Possibly 'Programming Interfaces'? Maybe also
> 'Concurrent Programming', although that might be stretching it.
>
> Daniel
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>

-- 
Alp Mestan
--- http://blog.mestan.fr/
--- http://alp.developpez.com/
--- In charge of the Qt, Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence sections on
Developpez