From: Alp Mestan (alpmestan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-26 19:57:23
I think utility would be fine.
Concurrent Programming is in my opinion too "restrictive".
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Daniel James <daniel_james_at_[hidden]>wrote:
> On 26/07/2008, Emil Dotchevski <emil_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Thanks Daniel!
> > Actually, I am not sure what's the best category for this library.
> > It's a low level lib, so perhaps it should go under utility,
> > miscellaneous doesn't seem descriptive enough. Any thoughts?
> I'm really not sure. Possibly 'Programming Interfaces'? Maybe also
> 'Concurrent Programming', although that might be stretching it.
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
-- Alp Mestan --- http://blog.mestan.fr/ --- http://alp.developpez.com/ --- In charge of the Qt, Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence sections on Developpez
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk