Re: [boost] 1.36 documentation

From: Alp Mestan (alpmestan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-27 13:20:30

That's not a bad idea.

And static_assert would be fine for "error handling" too as it's about
compile-time errors.

On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Emil Dotchevski <emil_at_[hidden]>wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Alp Mestan <alpmestan_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > I think the lib can be added in Concurrent Programming, Programming
> > Interfaces and maybe Misc.
> > It isn't worth creating a category for it.
>
> If we create utility group, I'm sure other libraries would be added to
> it. The variant library comes to mind, I see it in containers now but
> it isn't really a container. Other libs that can go in utility:
> tokenizer, static_assert, etc. The real issue is that "utility" isn't
> very descriptive, this is the main reason I don't like it.
>
> Maybe we can create "error handling" group?
>
> Emil Dotchevski
> Reverge Studios, Inc.
> http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>

-- 
Alp Mestan
--- http://blog.mestan.fr/
--- http://alp.developpez.com/
--- In charge of the Qt, Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence sections on
Developpez