From: Alp Mestan (alpmestan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-27 13:20:30
That's not a bad idea.
And static_assert would be fine for "error handling" too as it's about
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Emil Dotchevski <emil_at_[hidden]>wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Alp Mestan <alpmestan_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > I think the lib can be added in Concurrent Programming, Programming
> > Interfaces and maybe Misc.
> > It isn't worth creating a category for it.
> If we create utility group, I'm sure other libraries would be added to
> it. The variant library comes to mind, I see it in containers now but
> it isn't really a container. Other libs that can go in utility:
> tokenizer, static_assert, etc. The real issue is that "utility" isn't
> very descriptive, this is the main reason I don't like it.
> Maybe we can create "error handling" group?
> Emil Dotchevski
> Reverge Studios, Inc.
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
-- Alp Mestan --- http://blog.mestan.fr/ --- http://alp.developpez.com/ --- In charge of the Qt, Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence sections on Developpez