Re: [boost] FSM Review Announcement

From: Chris Knight (cknite_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-06 12:48:39

On Wednesday 06 August 2008 9:59:43 am Andrey Semashev wrote:
> I'm not sure what you mean by that "registering". The library does one
> event dispatching if it is known at compile time that no entry in the
> transition map will be triggered. If a transition map entry is
> triggered, then two dispatches are done - one to deliver event to the
> transition handler, and second to deliver the event to the active state.
> In any case, dispatching is very efficient and is basically a call on a
> function pointer that is acquired from an array by index.

I was referring to deferred event dispatching. I see on another thread that 
Boost.FSM does not support such a concept. I was simply noting that any
such implementation can/should be done without the use of rtti/virtuals.

Chris