From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-07 13:47:08
On Thursday 07 August 2008 20:14:32 Chris Knight wrote:
> On Thursday 07 August 2008 10:58:21 am Andrey Semashev wrote:
> > I see. However, tags are not a good candidate to dispatch events on
> > since different events can have same tags. I think, the event itself
> > should contain enough information to be dispatched after being postponed.
> > BTW, you can achieve the same functionality right now if you bind the
> > event to the process function of the FSM and save the call into
> > boost::function.
> I never thought of that one. Maybe a little mention in the Documentation
> would be good. I imagine other potential users might want to do the same.
Ok, I will.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk