Boost logo

Boost :

From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-07 21:23:27

David Abrahams wrote:
> on Wed Aug 06 2008, Beman Dawes <> wrote:
>> Eric Niebler wrote:
>>> Beman Dawes wrote:
>>>> Eric Niebler wrote:
>>>>> Just spoke with Rene about this ...
>>>>> Eric Niebler wrote:
>>>>>> How come the "report time" on nearly every page of release test
>>>>>> results is dated July 15th?
>>>>>> For example:
>>>> AFAIK, that's the wrong page to be looking at. The page I use to
>>>> make decisions is
>>> Whew, thanks Beman! How do you get to that page? I go to,
>>> click on "Development", and then on "Release Summary".
>> I don't look at, because I assume it applies to the
>> current release.
>> Instead I look at, because I assume it applies to the
>> release under development.
> Can we expect developers (and other interested parties) to figure out
> that they need to look at a hidden site to find this information? And
> doesn't the fact that it's a beta mean that it could churn and make the
> results unavailable or wrong without warning? Shouldn't our most
> important testing results be hosted in a stable environment? It's
> common to have a "development" or "developers" link that takes you to
> materials about the unreleased code on the front page of a project's
> site.
> Sounds like the current arrangement is not very user-friendly. Can we
> change it?

Perhaps you should read my various replies in this thread.

-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. -
-- rrivera/ (msn) - grafik/
-- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at