|
Boost : |
From: Peter Bartlett (pete_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-11 09:02:47
Quoting Markus Schöpflin <markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden]>:
> I still believe that the recursion depth is a function of the code, and
> not the compiler, but there seems to be a difference in how the
> recursion depth is calculated.
It is a function of code, but bear in mind the code might be different
for different compilers. Compiler workarounds in Boost code and
different implementations of the the standard library are two possible
reasons for different template instantiation depths.
Pete
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk