Re: [boost] FSM Review Announcement

From: Henrik Vallgren (henrik.vallgren_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-14 11:48:08

Is there any difference between the book and the sample described at:

http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_35_0/libs/mpl/doc/paper/mpl_paper.pdf

David Abrahams-3 wrote:
> 
> 
> I'm confused.  If states 1 and 2 have associated data of types A and B,
> the fact that A and B are both derived from C does not mean that there
> is only one copy of the base class... or are you doing something special
> to have states 1 and 2 share a single object of type D derived from A
> and B?
> 
> [Please keep in mind that I'm not trying to say that the Book's FSM is
> better than the one in your library.  It's clearly more limited.]
> 
> -- 
> Dave Abrahams
> BoostPro Computing
> http://www.boostpro.com
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FSM-Review-Announcement-tp18820219p18984305.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.