|
|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-17 23:48:13
on Sun Aug 17 2008, "Robert Ramey" <ramey-AT-rrsd.com> wrote:
> My real point is that there is no reason that any tools that
> are used by boost should be treated any differently than
> any libraries used by boost.
Does that assertion have any practical implications for the issue
being discussed?
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk