Re: [boost] Documentation Redux (was Re: Boost 1.36.0 release notice)

From: Daniel James (daniel_james_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-18 06:02:47

2008/8/18 Dean Michael Berris <mikhailberis_at_[hidden]>:
>
> Another option (that I think Dave Abrahams has been doing) is to use
> RST [0] to make writing/reading the source documentation easier than
> having to rely on Boostbook+XSLT (which I personally think is a
> brittle tool-chain).

We haven't a single problem with boostbook or xslt. It's actually
quite stable. The problems have been with boost build, quickbook
(possibly due to Spirit), doxygen and latex. Basically everything but
boostbook. Most of the problems seem to involve poor support for
windows. I've been testing on linux which is why they weren't
discovered sooner.

Daniel