Boost logo

Boost :

From: Daniel Wallin (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-18 07:33:11

David Abrahams wrote:
> on Mon Aug 18 2008, "Dean Michael Berris" <> wrote:
>> Another option (that I think Dave Abrahams has been doing) is to use
>> RST [0] to make writing/reading the source documentation easier than
>> having to rely on Boostbook+XSLT (which I personally think is a
>> brittle tool-chain).
>> Quickbook is also a nice documentation language to use, but the
>> reliance on Boostbook+XSLT makes it harder to pull-off. I don't know
>> though if Quickbook can be made to generate HTML directly instead of
>> XML. Joel?
> We could "easily" build a python-based BoostBook/DocBook -> xxx
> converter. What I'd actually do, though, is transform
> BoostBook/DocBook into docutils' internal format, then feed that into
> docutils and use its already-written backend writers to generate
> whatever xxx we chose ;-).

If we were to explore that path, might be of
interest. It's a documentation framework built on docutils, that could
give us a uniform look and feel, plus cross referencing. Seems geared
toward Python, but I'm sure it could be extended with whatever docnodes
we could need.

Daniel Wallin
BoostPro Computing

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at