Re: [boost] [boost exception]complaint

From: Emil Dotchevski (emil_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-20 15:28:52

On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Emil Dotchevski wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> What is an "implicit requirement"?  You mean that previous users
>>> of boost/throw_exception where remiss if they didn't derive
>>> from std::exception or if they didn't surround throw_exception
>>> with #if BOOST_NO_TYPEID.
>
>> The semantics of boost::throw_exception have not changed.
>
> That's where we differ.  It seems to me that on certain platforms
> things won't work as they had before.

If that's true, it's a bug and I'll fix it.

Emil Dotchevski
Reverge Studios, Inc.
http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode