From: Emil Dotchevski (emil_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-20 15:28:52
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Emil Dotchevski wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> What is an "implicit requirement"? You mean that previous users
>>> of boost/throw_exception where remiss if they didn't derive
>>> from std::exception or if they didn't surround throw_exception
>>> with #if BOOST_NO_TYPEID.
>> The semantics of boost::throw_exception have not changed.
> That's where we differ. It seems to me that on certain platforms
> things won't work as they had before.
If that's true, it's a bug and I'll fix it.
Reverge Studios, Inc.