From: Gennaro Prota (gennaro.prota_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-20 19:34:20
Daniel James wrote:
> This has come up before. It's actually a problem with the preprocessor
> library and gcc 4.4's preprocessor. I wrote about it here:
> I was going to write to the gcc people about this, but never got round
> to it. If anyone else would like to take this on, that'd be very
> helpful as I'm quite busy with other things at the moment.
What one can do? AFAICT they're correct. Are you thinking to convince
them to be intentionally non-conforming?