From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-27 09:36:22
on Tue Aug 26 2008, Jonathan Biggar <jon-AT-biggar.org> wrote:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> on Tue Aug 26 2008, Christian Larsen <contact-AT-dword.dk> wrote:
>>> Yes, that's right. But still I don't see how that would make it
>>> possible to keep a stable interface, and make point releases of
>>> that. Unless all developers agree to only merge non-interface breaking
>>> changes into "ReleaseReady".
>> People who want point releases aren't just asking for what we _think_
>> will be "no interface-breaking changes," because the best we can do is
>> guess. Who knows what the effects will actually be on their platform in
>> their environment? They're asking for the release, exactly as it was,
>> plus bugfixes. That's it. No new features, no new libraries, period.
> As a long time user of boost, I agree, almost 100%. :)
> 99.9% of the time, a point fix should make no interface
> change. Unfortunately, there is that .1% where the only way to fix a
> bug is to change the interface.
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk