|
Boost : |
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-29 05:01:42
Gennaro Prota wrote:
> John, is BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG correctly defined for Borland 5.6.4? Many
> test failures seem related to this (I'm referring to trunk).
Apologies, I think I let this one slip through the cracks, which failures
are you refering to?
Regards, John.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk