From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-29 05:01:42
Gennaro Prota wrote:
> John, is BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG correctly defined for Borland 5.6.4? Many
> test failures seem related to this (I'm referring to trunk).
Apologies, I think I let this one slip through the cracks, which failures
are you refering to?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk