From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-02 11:02:24
on Tue Sep 02 2008, Arno SchÃ¶dl <aschoedl-AT-think-cell.com> wrote:
> The RangeEx documentation writes something like "what algorithms are to
> containers, adaptor ranges are to ranges". Whenever you are applying one
> (non-permutating) algorithm to a container, and then another and then another,
> you can stack range adaptors. It's like lazy evaluation of a Haskell list.
Sheesh; give me a little credit, please. I know what range adaptors do.
> Looking through our code for adaptor ranges, I find:
> These ranges are all actually used in our program. All these ranges need an end
> iterator, and any stacking of any combination of these ranges leads to the
> problems we are discussing here. I don't find this impractical.
You're missing my point. Are you indeed making such stacks? If so,
what are you doing with them?
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com