From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-02 14:39:05
on Tue Sep 02 2008, Arno SchÃ¶dl <aschoedl-AT-think-cell.com> wrote:
>> optimum solution they are at least implementations of the functionality. I
>> would gladly accept superior contributions ;-). I am also happy to spend
>> more time improving them myself. I have to apologise for slow response
>> times, my full-time job simply doesn't allow me enough time to contribute to
>> this discussion as much as I probably ought to. You have made some very
>> valid technical points, let's focus on these please.
> My last post was not intended to put pressure on anyone to change
> anything, and I am very grateful for having boost. But Dave evidently
> thinks I am wasting everyone's time,
I don't think I said anything of the sort.
I think you're asking interesting questions that might lead to some
important work. However, it seems to me that you already have a general
answer in mind, and it might be better to back up and look at the real
problems you want to solve before moving on to the answer.
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk