Re: [boost] lifetime of ranges vs. iterators

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-02 14:39:05

on Tue Sep 02 2008, Arno Schödl <aschoedl-AT-think-cell.com> wrote:

>> optimum solution they are at least implementations of the functionality. I
>> would gladly accept superior contributions ;-). I am also happy to spend
>> more time improving them myself. I have to apologise for slow response
>> times, my full-time job simply doesn't allow me enough time to contribute to
>> this discussion as much as I probably ought to. You have made some very
>> valid technical points, let's focus on these please.
>
> My last post was not intended to put pressure on anyone to change
> anything, and I am very grateful for having boost. But Dave evidently
> thinks I am wasting everyone's time,

I don't think I said anything of the sort.  

I think you're asking interesting questions that might lead to some
important work.  However, it seems to me that you already have a general
answer in mind, and it might be better to back up and look at the real
problems you want to solve before moving on to the answer.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com