Re: [boost] Stacking iterators vs. dataflow

Subject: Re: [boost] Stacking iterators vs. dataflow
From: Michael Marcin (mike.marcin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-03 12:30:27

Stjepan Rajko wrote:
> 
> As far as the dataflow library goes, some sort of a "automatic task
> division" library would indeed be great in conjunction with dataflow,
> but I see this as orthogonal to dataflow.  Automatic task division
> could be useful without dataflow, and dataflow could be useful without
> automatic task division.  Is it your opinion that some sort of a task
> division strategy would be necessary for the dataflow library to be
> useful?
> 

That other task library you are describing sounds a lot like 
http://www.threadingbuildingblocks.org/

Thanks,

Michael Marcin