Re: [boost] min function that accepts any number of arguments

Subject: Re: [boost] min function that accepts any number of arguments
From: Scott McMurray (me22.ca+boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-03 16:33:42

On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 16:27, Peng Yu <pengyu.ut_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Since Pseudo-vararg code is a mess, we may not what to do it at this
> moment. But GCC has an option -std=c++0x, can the variadic version min
> (non-pseudo) be added in boost at least to support GCC before the
> upcoming C++ standard finalized?
>

I suspect that if you have the GCC that supports it, you can also get
the libstdc++ that has a variable-argument min.  (Or an
initializer-list version, if the paper from the lastest mailing goes
through.)