Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] lifetime of ranges vs. iterators
From: Arno SchÃ¶dl (aschoedl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-04 02:34:34

Next message: vicente.botet: "[boost] [exception] missing public header files in SVN"
Previous message: joaquin_at_[hidden]: "[boost] [repost][serialization] generic runtime helpers"
In reply to: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] lifetime of ranges vs. iterators"
Next in thread: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [boost] lifetime of ranges vs. iterators"

>> You don't need to. The underlying iterator can check explicitly.
>
>A pointer can check explicitly?

C'mon, a wrapper can, Steven said it already.

Arno

--
Dr. Arno Schoedl Â· aschoedl_at_[hidden] 
Technical Director 
 
think-cell Software GmbH Â· Invalidenstr. 34 Â· 10115 Berlin, Germany 
http://www.think-cell.com Â· phone +49-30-666473-10 Â· toll-free (US) +1-800-891-8091
Directors: Dr. Markus Hannebauer, Dr. Arno Schoedl Â· Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 85229

Next message: vicente.botet: "[boost] [exception] missing public header files in SVN"
Previous message: joaquin_at_[hidden]: "[boost] [repost][serialization] generic runtime helpers"
In reply to: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] lifetime of ranges vs. iterators"
Next in thread: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [boost] lifetime of ranges vs. iterators"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk