Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [iterator] Efficiency of transform_iterator
From: Arno Schödl (aschoedl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-04 09:22:40

Next message: Thorsten Ottosen: "Re: [boost] [iterator] could non-small predicates/functors be stored as boost::optional<T> to avoid double construction?"
Previous message: Giovanni Piero Deretta: "Re: [boost] [iterator] Efficiency of transform_iterator"
In reply to: Giovanni Piero Deretta: "Re: [boost] [iterator] Efficiency of transform_iterator"

> What about adding as yet another adaptor, a memoizing iterator? That
> would solve the problem in general.

True, may be nice for things like file access.

Arno

--
Dr. Arno Schoedl · aschoedl_at_[hidden] 
Technical Director 
 
think-cell Software GmbH · Invalidenstr. 34 · 10115 Berlin, Germany 
http://www.think-cell.com · phone +49-30-666473-10 · toll-free (US) +1-800-891-8091
Directors: Dr. Markus Hannebauer, Dr. Arno Schoedl · Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 85229

Next message: Thorsten Ottosen: "Re: [boost] [iterator] could non-small predicates/functors be stored as boost::optional<T> to avoid double construction?"
Previous message: Giovanni Piero Deretta: "Re: [boost] [iterator] Efficiency of transform_iterator"
In reply to: Giovanni Piero Deretta: "Re: [boost] [iterator] Efficiency of transform_iterator"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk