Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [interprocess] Just a note of thanks to the developers :)
From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-04 14:19:20

Next message: Jurko GospodnetiÄ‡: "Re: [boost] [RFC] Boost library name mangling and Microsoft's 'secure STL' feature."
Previous message: Thorsten Ottosen: "Re: [boost] [iterator] could non-small predicates/functors be stored as boost::optional<T> to avoid double construction?"
In reply to: Faisal Vali: "[boost] [interprocess] Just a note of thanks to the developers :)"
Next in thread: Faisal Vali: "Re: [boost] [interprocess] Just a note of thanks to the developers:)"
Reply: Faisal Vali: "Re: [boost] [interprocess] Just a note of thanks to the developers:)"

Faisal Vali wrote:
> I Have been working on some COM components in the windows environment that
> have required communication across processes. The abstractions the
> interprocess library provides have greatly simplified my life (as have many
> of the other libs in boost, and i have been negligent in my thanks).
> Thank you so much!

Thank you for using Interprocess. Feel free to suggest any improvement

Regards,

Ion

Next message: Jurko GospodnetiÄ‡: "Re: [boost] [RFC] Boost library name mangling and Microsoft's 'secure STL' feature."
Previous message: Thorsten Ottosen: "Re: [boost] [iterator] could non-small predicates/functors be stored as boost::optional<T> to avoid double construction?"
In reply to: Faisal Vali: "[boost] [interprocess] Just a note of thanks to the developers :)"
Next in thread: Faisal Vali: "Re: [boost] [interprocess] Just a note of thanks to the developers:)"
Reply: Faisal Vali: "Re: [boost] [interprocess] Just a note of thanks to the developers:)"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk