Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [interprocess] Just a note of thanks to the developers :)
From: Robert Jones (robertgbjones_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-04 15:07:04

Next message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [iterator] could non-small predicates/functors be stored as boost::optional<T> to avoid double construction?"
Previous message: Michael Marcin: "Re: [boost] lifetime of ranges vs. iterators"
In reply to: Faisal Vali: "[boost] [interprocess] Just a note of thanks to the developers :)"

On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Faisal Vali <faisalv_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> I Have been working on some COM components in the windows environment that
> have required communication across processes. The abstractions the
> interprocess library provides have greatly simplified my life (as have many
> of the other libs in boost, and i have been negligent in my thanks).
> Thank you so much!
>
>
Well said! And not only that you get first class support too.

- Rob.

Next message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [iterator] could non-small predicates/functors be stored as boost::optional<T> to avoid double construction?"
Previous message: Michael Marcin: "Re: [boost] lifetime of ranges vs. iterators"
In reply to: Faisal Vali: "[boost] [interprocess] Just a note of thanks to the developers :)"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk