Subject: Re: [boost] [repost][serialization] generic runtime helpers
From: Joaquin M Lopez Munoz (joaquin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-05 13:33:27
Robert Ramey <ramey <at> rrsd.com> writes:
> joaquin <at> tid.es wrote:
> > 1. Is there any tentative release version for getting this included?
> > 2. Is the idea to include the generic runtime helper as part of the
> > core API of an Archive, or will it be just an adaptor? In other
> > words, would the core "Saving Archive" and "Loading Archive"
> > concpets be extended to also feature this runtime helper?
> I've considered that and don't think its a great idea. I looked over
> the code in flyweight and concluded that, even though the usage of
> a helper might make the loading of an archive slightly more efficient
> it would not be strictly necessary.
How'd you do it? I'm trying to rewrite my serialization code
in a helper-free fashion and can't find a way.
[I intend to answer to the rest of your post within the following days.]
JoaquÃn M LÃ³pez MuÃ±oz
TelefÃ³nica, InvestigaciÃ³n y Desarrollo
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk