Subject: Re: [boost] [interprocess] Just a note of thanks to the developers:)
From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-05 17:55:22
Faisal Vali wrote:
> Well, I was just wondering what was the reason for not including a
I just didn't see any use case for that. Is there any C++
synchronization library that offers this kind of mutex? Why do you need it?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk