Subject: Re: [boost] [boost numeric binding] patch
From: Thomas Klimpel (Thomas.Klimpel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-08 09:01:46
I could certainly apply your patch, but why doesn't GCCXML defines
__GNUC__ in the first place, when it's effectively just a gcc? Or is it
indeed different from gcc, so that I should test that it really works?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk