Subject: [boost] HP-UX_pa_risc_aCC test failure
From: Emil Dotchevski (emil_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-09 15:28:34
I'm looking at this failure:
The assertion is an indication that a particular function that throws
an exception returned without throwing an exception. Does this
platform support exception handling? If not, shouldn't
BOOST_NO_EXCEPTIONS be #defined?
Reverge Studios, Inc.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk