Subject: Re: [boost] Tests are a mess
From: Emil Dotchevski (emil_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-10 17:20:11
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Pete Bartlett <pete_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Robert Ramey wrote:
>>[..] But don't go foisting on me a whole new layer of work [...]
> Sadly, by introducing boost::serialization::throw_exception, you have
> foisted work on me and other users of your library. Now we have to implement
> boost::serialization::throw_exception instead of just having one
> boost::throw_exception. This is exactly the kind of breakage you've been so
> strongly opposed to.
You didn't have to implement boost::serialization::throw_exception.
That was your own decision, which I don't intend to object. I've
learned that simply because I don't see the logic behind a given
decision, doesn't mean that it was illogical.
Reverge Studios, Inc.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk