Subject: Re: [boost] HP-UX_pa_risc_aCC test failure
From: Emil Dotchevski (emil_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-11 12:50:29
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Matus Chochlik <chochlik_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Bruno Lalande <bruno.lalande_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I've been using this compiler a few years ago and I remember it wasn't
>> possible to write a function that only throws an exception without
>> having a warning complaining that the function never returns.
>> Basically, the compiler seemed to "ignore" the fact that a throw is
>> supposed to return. It might be the reason of your error. My
>> workaround used to be to put a dummy return statement just after the
> if this is the reason, then using the BOOST_UNREACHABLE_RETURN(result)
> macro is (AFAICT) the best option as some other compilers complain about
> returns (or any other code) behind unconditional throw being unreachable.
No, this is not the reason.
fails only on that platform (if you ignore stale results in the test
matrix, and Borland which isn't supported), and the problem being
reported is that a function which is supposed to throw an exception,
returns without throwing.
Reverge Studios, Inc.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk