Subject: Re: [boost] [Dataflow] [Review] Dataflow review has ended
From: Chris Knight (cknite_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-11 15:24:47
On Thursday 11 September 2008 1:56:57 pm David Abrahams wrote:
> on Thu Sep 11 2008, Gennadiy Rozental <rogeeff-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
> > Jaakko JÃ¤rvi <jarvi <at> cs.tamu.edu> writes:
> >> The number of reviews for the dataflow library was very low (one,
> >> positive).
> > This seems to be general theme nowdays. Maybe we can have some kind of
> > pre-registration for people planing to submit the review and reschedule
> > it if this number is less than some threshold (5?)
> This seems like a good idea. There is supposed to be a "gauge interest"
> phase to the submission process. Is that failing to work, or are we
> ignoring its results, or are people claiming interest and then not
> submitting reviews?
The pre-registration would also help review submitters schedule out time and
coordinate amongst themselves an appropriate deadline that works for those
interested. It's easy to indicate interest but equally easy to miss the
review deadline when something regarding the day job comes up and chews up
the week the review is going on.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk