Re: [boost] Improving the assignment operators of various Boosttypes

Subject: Re: [boost] Improving the assignment operators of various Boosttypes
From: Gevorg Voskanyan (v_gevorg_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-11 15:54:54

David Abrahams wrote:
> If you're asking whether such functions should be documented as nothrow
> after the modification, I think they should: it could be useful
> information for move-only types (with nonthrowing move ctors).

Yes, documenting the operators as nothrow is what I had in mind, thanks!

Best Regards,
Gevorg