Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [Dataflow] [Review] Dataflow review has ended
From: Michael Marcin (mike.marcin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-12 16:31:52


Andrey Semashev wrote:

>
> I think, one significant reason for such a situation is that the delay
> between such a query of interest (and submitting the library review) and
> the actual review is quite big. For example, the recently reviewed
> Boost.FSM was in the queue for more than a year, IIRC. Although there
> were reasons for the delay in this particular case, it's not a sole
> example - many libraries don't even have review managers for
> months/years. So when the review happens, many potential reviewers that
> were excited about the library while the interest poll, now either are
> gone or found/developed another solution for their needs.
>
> I have no concrete suggestion for improvement on this,

Maybe Boost should have a review Stack instead of a review Queue. :)


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk