Subject: Re: [boost] [threadpool] relation with TR2 proposal
Date: 2008-09-13 14:56:36
Am Samstag, 13. September 2008 10:29:25 schrieb vicente.botet:
> Olivier what about adding launch_in_pool to the threadpool library?
I don't know a reason to introduce launch_in_pool!
> Olivier, what will be the inpact on your library if it uses Anthony Futures
> library instead? What will be missing on the Anthony Futures library?
chaining tasks and lazy evaluation of task would not be possible. As Anthony
noticed in one of his previous post - Braddocks future lib has more features.
Maybe a merge of both future libs will become part of boost.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk