Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [Xpressive] vs libpcre performance
From: Sebastian Redl (sebastian.redl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-14 05:47:27

Next message: Johan Torp: "Re: [boost] [threadpool] relation with TR2 proposal"
Previous message: Boris: "Re: [boost] [UUID] Still alive?"
In reply to: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [Xpressive] vs libpcre performance"

David Abrahams wrote:
> You should really try them with identical options, as -O3 is known to be
> worse than -O2 in some cases.
>
Used -O2 and -DNDEBUG on both, same result.

Sebastian

Next message: Johan Torp: "Re: [boost] [threadpool] relation with TR2 proposal"
Previous message: Boris: "Re: [boost] [UUID] Still alive?"
In reply to: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [Xpressive] vs libpcre performance"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk