Subject: Re: [boost] [threadpool] relation with TR2 proposal
Date: 2008-09-16 05:48:04
Am Dienstag, 16. September 2008 07:20:33 schrieb vicente.botet:
> It's my _guess_ also. I think that the Boost threadpool library must
> integrate child-tasks and task stealing between worker threads.
I'm currently working on a work-stealing strategy.
> Some references on fork-join framework for the reader:
> article "A Java Fork/Join Framework"
Fork/Join uses work-stealing - you need a kind of synchronization between all
worker threads to finish one task (joining subtasks).
I think this is not in the scope of threadpool.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk