Subject: Re: [boost] Boost c++ language conformance
From: Gennaro Prota (gennaro.prota_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-18 19:02:41
David Abrahams wrote:
>>> Most of those "screw-ups" are actually implemented by EDG for Intel and
>>> other vendors, because Intel's customers demand compatibility with
>>> other, more popular "screwed-up" implementations such as VC++ and GCC.
>> I don't think so. Unless someone from EDG tells me that,
> They've told me so. Do you think I'd make it up?
No. It's just that we were talking about different "screw-ups". Of
course I know that they provide compatibility modes.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk