Subject: Re: [boost] request for interest: stable vector
From: Emil Dotchevski (emil_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-29 13:53:51
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 12:56 AM, <joaquin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Emil Dotchevski escribió:
>> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Joaquin M Lopez Munoz <joaquin_at_[hidden]>
>>> Hi Emil, as promised, some profile results are shown at:
>> This is interesting, so basically the stable iterators/references are
>> achieved by allocating each object in a separate node.
>> This got me thinking, from certain point of view the difference
>> between std::list and your stable_vector is the ability of the latter
>> to return elements by index in O(1). Isn't it possible to decouple
>> this ability from the container itself? In other words, could your
>> code be refactored to provide indexing over any type of "host
> Well, sort of. Basically, that's what you can achieve by adding a random
> access index
> (http://tinyurl.com/4ruu2c ) to a multi_index_container.
I wasn't trying to achieve anything, except to point out that perhaps
it is possible to decouple the indexing functionality from the storage
functionality, in principle.
Reverge Studios, Inc.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk