Subject: Re: [boost] phoenix::bind
From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-29 22:53:55
Peter Dimov wrote:
> Eric Niebler:
>> Lambda has some quirks that it would be best to leave behind.
> I agree, but I suspect that we don't agree on the specific quirks to be
> left behind.
> The unary & is on the top of my list. &x should never be overloaded,
> IMHO. Yes, we do have addressof. I'd still have gone with addr(_1) instead.
Let's put this to the vote too. I'm a fence sitter in this case:
Allow & to be overloaded: +0
Provide explicit addr(_1): +1
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://spirit.sf.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk