Re: [boost] phoenix::bind

Subject: Re: [boost] phoenix::bind
From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-29 22:53:55

Peter Dimov wrote:
> Eric Niebler:
> 
>> Lambda has some quirks that it would be best to leave behind.
> 
> I agree, but I suspect that we don't agree on the specific quirks to be 
> left behind.
> 
> The unary & is on the top of my list. &x should never be overloaded, 
> IMHO. Yes, we do have addressof. I'd still have gone with addr(_1) instead.

Let's put this to the vote too. I'm a fence sitter in this case:

Allow & to be overloaded:   +0
Provide explicit addr(_1):  +1

Regards,
-- 
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boostpro.com
http://spirit.sf.net