Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] Phoenix review starts today, September 21st
From: Patrick Mihelich (patrick.mihelich_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-30 03:11:05
I'm also in support of a second review for V3. Until the discussion sparked
by Daniel I was not very clear on the motivation for the current review, but
Eric's proposal sounds like a perfect way to move forward.
I have not used Phoenix, or even Lambda, but I do have some experience
working with Proto. If/when Phoenix V3 is under review, I'll be happy to dig
into the implementation details and (time permitting) write a proper review.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Joel de Guzman
> Daniel Walker wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Joel de Guzman
>> <joel_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> Eric's proposal solves this dilemma. I'm all for a second review.
>>> The review has proven to be sooo productive. I'm very pleased
>>> with the amount of feedback that it has generated. I enjoy
>>> reading each post and comment from such highly intelligent
>>> people and I want to have more of it, just to make sure that
>>> we are on the right track.
>> Excellent! So I think we may have some unanimity here, and I'm quite
>> pleased to change my vote and join in. So...
>> For the record, I hereby vote to Accept Phoenix on condition of a
>> second review before the release. :-)
> Thank you!
> Joel de Guzman
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk