Subject: Re: [boost] [simple_segregated_storage] segfault
From: Phil Bouchard (philippe_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-02 12:33:55
"Chris Newbold" <Chris.Newbold_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> The sp_counted_base at 0x82f4b28 at frame #0 is completely bogus. Some
> further instrumentation of the pool reveals that the address 0x82f4b28 is
> owned by the pool, but has never been handed out to the application.
I will verify this but what I personaly get is a ordered_malloc() failure on
the 2005th attempt. 3 blocks of memory get allocated / deallocated over and
over until the allocation routine fails.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk