Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] phoenix::bind
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-02 16:47:53


AMDG

Joel de Guzman wrote:
> Yep, I'm keeping the behavior of protect, not unlambda. As
> I mentioned in my other post. val(_1 < _2) can probably be
> the unlambda behavior.

I don't think it's a good idea to overload val like this, giving it
two different unrelated meanings.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk