Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [shared_ptr] Where is the bug?
From: Kasra Nassiri\(Math & ComSci\) (kasra_n500_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-03 12:05:10

Next message: vicente.botet: "Re: [boost] [shared_ptr] Where is the bug?"
Previous message: Roland Schwarz: "Re: [boost] [threadalert] alternative design for thread_member_ptr and thread preamble"
Maybe in reply to: vicente.botet: "[boost] [shared_ptr] Where is the bug?"

> No.
> You are invoking undefined behaviour.

Well, by definition you could not be more right, however, in practice my point applies. It is like the x86 sh(l/r) instructions, although for some values larger than the bitfield of the operand the instruction is undefined it behaves in a certain way :D.

However, you are right and I am wrong!

With best regards

Kasra Nassiri

Next message: vicente.botet: "Re: [boost] [shared_ptr] Where is the bug?"
Previous message: Roland Schwarz: "Re: [boost] [threadalert] alternative design for thread_member_ptr and thread preamble"
Maybe in reply to: vicente.botet: "[boost] [shared_ptr] Where is the bug?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk