Re: [boost] [simple_segregated_storage] segfault

Subject: Re: [boost] [simple_segregated_storage] segfault
From: Phil Bouchard (philippe_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-03 22:27:36

"Chris Newbold" <Chris.Newbold_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:6F6A2FC198A0F943ACC2259C38A2E30B6B6FB4BDB1_at_EXCHANGE-AH.ad.mathworks.com...
>> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] 
>> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]

[...]

> If unchecked, it eventually crashes for me inside of 
> simple_segregated_storage::try_malloc_n(), which I believe is what you're 
> seeing.
>
> The stack trace I quoted in my previous e-mail is the trace of the errant 
> write that corrupts the pool.

I had a chance to run some tests quickly this morning; it turns out all 
deallocations with corresponding size are valid.

-Phil