Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] phoenix::bind
From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-04 19:36:13

Steven Watanabe wrote:
> Joel de Guzman wrote:
>>>> lambda(_x, _y)[ let. _z = _x + _y, _z * _z ]
>>>> I think that the implicit let will be much less of an issue in a
>>>> lambda context than it is in Python (or Javascript), though.
>>> Doesn't that imply that _a, _b, ... have to be enumerated in the
>>> definition of let?
>> Not sure I understand.
> let. _z
> ^
> let must be an object that has a member called _z.

Right. Now I understand. Now I also understand why you want to be
able to name the locals. Pardon me for being slow. It's been an
overwhelming review.


Joel de Guzman

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at