Re: [boost] phoenix::bind

Subject: Re: [boost] phoenix::bind
From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-04 19:36:13

Steven Watanabe wrote:
> AMDG
> 
> Joel de Guzman wrote:
>>>>    lambda(_x, _y)[ let. _z = _x + _y, _z * _z ]
>>>>
>>>> I think that the implicit let will be much less of an issue in a 
>>>> lambda context than it is in Python (or Javascript), though.
>>>
>>> Doesn't that imply that _a, _b, ... have to be enumerated in the 
>>> definition of let?
>>
>> Not sure I understand.
> 
> let. _z
>   ^
> 
> let must be an object that has a member called _z.

Right. Now I understand. Now I also understand why you want to be
able to name the locals. Pardon me for being slow. It's been an
overwhelming review.

Regards,
-- 
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boostpro.com
http://spirit.sf.net