Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] type_with_alignment.hpp / alignment_of.hpp too heavy
From: Daniel Walker (daniel.j.walker_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-07 14:17:22

Next message: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] is_range metafunction"
Previous message: Tim Michals: "[boost] status on Coroutine library?"
In reply to: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] type_with_alignment.hpp / alignment_of.hpp too heavy"
Next in thread: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] type_with_alignment.hpp / alignment_of.hpp too heavy"

On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> FWIW, I think we should be removing VC 6 and 7.0 workarounds,
> particularly in libraries where there is some real downside to
> continued support for these now long obsolete compilers.

Hear, hear!

Daniel Walker

Next message: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] is_range metafunction"
Previous message: Tim Michals: "[boost] status on Coroutine library?"
In reply to: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] type_with_alignment.hpp / alignment_of.hpp too heavy"
Next in thread: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] type_with_alignment.hpp / alignment_of.hpp too heavy"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk